BigBazz 2008-01-14 02:24:10

Ahh the memories didnt have many of the toys back in the day but used to play power rangers :P just meant running around bashing shit and yelling AY-YAHHH when we got hit and fly to the ground.

Sashuno 2008-01-14 18:22:52

They were good up until Lost Galaxy, I think.
Then, along with most of TV, it all went down the crapper.
I used to have them, I believe I donated them to my old church to give to the needy kids.
Transformers, however.... THOSE were cool until Cartoon Network grabbed Hasbro by the balls. Then, it went downhill. I remember the OLD Optimus- the one with the armor that exploded off, and transformed into like, a jet, robot, monkey, and kick-ass car. Man, those were the days.

Optimus can kick any of the rangers' asses any day.
Especially the black ranger, since once they lose their token character, the show gets unplugged, Maybe Optimus will own him last, just for the hell of it.

bigblueDUMBASS 2008-01-16 03:14:24

you sir are a monster for not liking power rangers.

YOU HEAR ME1? MONSTER! EVERYTHING THE SPAM GROUPS SAID WAS TRUE! I DIDN'T TO BELIVEVE IT BUT ITS TRUE!

but in all seriousness i used to get a giant ass power rangers toy every christmas.

sci-guy 2008-03-03 22:30:53

my family was interested in it until overdrive drove itself into the ground. it sucked big fat hairy balls after that. it didn't even run its full season before jungle fury started! the series turned into a zombie from there on! okay bush! launch the nuke! you're gonna need an umbrella!

LBRocker 2008-04-09 06:05:38

Not any more, Stopped getting them two years ago. Gundams were the shit. I dunno, Something about giant robots blowing shit up like buildings, ships, tanks and other giant robots seems pretty badass when your five. I loved'em so much. I continued to buy them and cherish them. Now I might put them up on ebay.

Foric 2008-06-08 23:09:13

power rangers suck mud and there shows are the worst things iv ever seen in my life HORRIBLE effects

Wolfears2 2008-06-11 12:42:40

I used to watch that years ago. I could have sworn that in one of the episodes, the guy in the monster costume said something like "So god damn hot in here"...

celine123 2010-01-26 05:38:28

For many centuries, Christian writers accepted that Christmas was the actual date on which Jesus was born.[url=<a href="http://www.exact-exams.com/CCSE.html">http://www.exact-exams.com/CCSE.html</a>]ccse certification[/url] In the early eighteenth century, scholars began proposing alternative explanations. Isaac Newton argued that the date of Christmas was selected to correspond with the winter solstice,[url=<a href="http://www.exact-exams.com/CCVP.html">http://www.exact-exams.com/CCVP.html</a>]ccvp[/url] which the Romans called bruma and celebrated on December 25. In 1743, German Protestant Paul Ernst Jablonski argued Christmas was placed on December 25 to correspond with the Roman solar holiday Dies Natalis Solis Invicti and was therefore a "paganization" that debased the true church. According to the Judeo-Christian tradition, creation was on the date of the spring equinox, i.e.[url=<a href="http://www.exact-exams.com/CISSP.html">http://www.exact-exams.com/CISSP.html </a>]cissp training[/url] March 25 on the Roman calendar. This date is now celebrated as Annunciation and as the anniversary of Incarnation. In 1889, Louis Duchesne suggested that the date of Christmas was calculated as nine months after Annunciation, the traditional date of the conception of Jesus